Study type

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Effectiveness study (incl. comparative)
Drug utilisation
Study drug and medical condition

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code

(A10BX16) tirzepatide
(A10BJ06) semaglutide

Medical condition to be studied

Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Population studied

Age groups

Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Estimated number of subjects

540
Study design details

Main study objective

The main objective is to compare the real-world effectiveness of tirzepatide vs. oral semaglutide as measured by HbA1c and body weight change from baseline after up to 12 months of treatment.

Outcomes

Primary objective is to compare the real-world effectiveness of tirzepatide vs. oral semaglutide as measured by HbA1c change from baseline after up to 12 months of treatment. Key secondary objective is to compare the real-world effectiveness of tirzepatide vs. oral semaglutide as measured by body weight change and percent change from baseline after up to 12 months of treatment.

Data analysis plan

In the efficacy estimand analysis, change from baseline in HbA1c after up to 12 months of treatment will be analyzed for the EAS using a MMRM with index treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, and baseline variables with imbalance remaining after performing IPTW despite being used for the PS model as fixed effects. In the ITT estimand analysis, change from baseline in HbA1c after up to 12 months of treatment will be analyzed for the FAS using an ANCOVA model with index treatment and baseline variables with imbalance remaining after performing IPTW despite being used for the PS model as covariates. Missing values for HbA1c at the 12-month evaluation point will be imputed based on participants who discontinued index therapy or initiated some rescue medication before or at 12 months and whose HbA1c values at the 12-month evaluation point are available (‘retrieve dropout’).