Study type

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Assessment of risk minimisation measure implementation or effectiveness
Safety study (incl. comparative)
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cohort
Study drug and medical condition

Name of medicine

Paxlovid

Study drug International non-proprietary name (INN) or common name

NIRMATRELVIR
RITONAVIR

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code

(J05AE) Protease inhibitors
(J05AE30) nirmatrelvir and ritonavir

Medical condition to be studied

Jaundice
Vomiting
Nausea
Diarrhoea
Abdominal pain
Dysgeusia
Headache
Anaphylactic reaction

Additional medical condition(s)

Hepatic transaminase elevations, clinical hepatitis
Population studied

Age groups

Infants and toddlers (28 days – 23 months)
Children (2 to < 12 years)
Adolescents (12 to < 18 years)
Adult and elderly population (>18 years)
Adults (18 to < 65 years)
Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Elderly (≥ 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Special population of interest

Hepatic impaired
Renal impaired
Study design details

Main study objective

Assess the safety of Paxlovid among 1) individuals with moderate or severe hepatic impairment and 2) individuals with moderate or severe renal impairment; compared to users of molnupiravir or to unexposed.

Outcomes

Hepatic transaminase elevations, clinical hepatitis, or jaundice, severe vomiting, nausea, diarrhoea, or abdominal pain, dysgeusia, headache, or hypertension, anaphylactic reactions.

Data analysis plan

The study will have a cohort design, the design is retrospective, and the data were collected prospectively. Focusing on the target populations, the descriptive component will include tabulations of age, sex, comorbidities, selected concurrent medications, COVID-19 vaccination status, history of COVID-19, current COVID-19 status and setting of Paxlovid use (among Paxlovid users). Comparative analyses will be based on the estimation of risk/prevalence, risk/prevalence ratios, and risk/prevalence differences. Comparative analyses will control for measured confounding within each data source. Aggregated results from each data source will be combined using meta-analytic techniques as numbers allow. If a study population is too small, analyses will be only descriptive, pooling of results from various data sources will be undertaken only if at least 3 independent data points are available.
Documents
Study report
English (1.8 MB - PDF)View document