Non-Interventional, cross-sectional study to describe health-related quality of life among controlled and uncontrolled patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on anticoagulants (RE-QUOL study)

30/12/2016
19/10/2026
EU PAS number:
EUPAS16988
Study
Finalised
Study type

Study topic

Disease /health condition
Human medicinal product

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Evaluation of patient-reported outcomes

Data collection methods

Combined primary data collection and secondary use of data
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cross-sectional
Study drug and medical condition

Medicinal product name

Study drug International non-proprietary name (INN) or common name

DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code

(B01AE07) dabigatran etexilate
dabigatran etexilate

Medical condition to be studied

Atrial fibrillation
Population studied

Short description of the study population

Nonvalvular AF (NVAF) patients with uncontrolled anticoagulation status treated with VKA, and of NVAF patients with controlled anticoagulation status treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC).
Inclusion criteria were:
1. The patient is willing and provides written informed consent to participate in this study.
2. The patient is at least 18 years of age.
3. The patient has a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
4. The patient is on the same anticoagulant therapy (VKA or DOAC) during at least 6 months and maximum 2 years.
5. If treated with VKA, availability of %TTR in past analytical records or enough amount of INR measures to calculate it.

Age groups

  • Adults (18 to < 46 years)
  • Adults (46 to < 65 years)
  • Adults (65 to < 75 years)
  • Adults (75 to < 85 years)
  • Adults (85 years and over)

Special population of interest

Other

Special population of interest, other

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients

Estimated number of subjects

500
Study design details

Study design

Observational multicenter and cross-sectional study

Main study objective

The primary objective of the study is to describe the HRQoL in uncontrolled patients treated with VKA and controlled patients treated with VKA or DOAC.

Setting

This study was conducted in the Autonomous Communities of Madrid, Valencia and Andalucía (Spain). Forty-seven internal medicine specialists from 38 Hospital sites regularly prescribing DOACs and VKA for stroke prevention in NVAF according to the respective Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) participated in the study.

Outcomes

The primary outcome is the health-related quality of life and will be obtained with the results of the sawicki questionnaire at study visit. The questionnaire includes 32 itemsgrouped in 5 dimensions. Patients will estimate the impact of each item on their selfperceived treatment-related quality of life on a scale of 1 (total disagreement) to 6 (total agreement). The secondary outcome is the uncontrolled patient profile and will be defined by thefollowing variables collected from patient medical records.

Data analysis plan

The primary outcome of the study is the health-related quality of life as measured by the Sawicki questionnaire. The scores of each individual question will be summarized descriptively in the controlled and uncontrolled patients. In addition, the summary score for each dimension of the questionnaire will be calculated for each patient by dividing the total score by the number of items included in that dimension and summarized in the same way as the individual questions.

Summary results

DISCUSSION
The study presented HRQoL perceptions of NVAF patients on anticoagulants, either controlled or uncontrolled, assessed by the validated Spanish adaptation of the Sawicki questionnaire, which included five different dimensions (general treatment satisfaction, self-efficacy, distress, daily hassles and strained social network). From a descriptive point of view, controlled patients (treated with DOAC or VKA) had mean scores closer to a high perceived HRQoL in the 5 dimensions of the questionnaire, with remarkably high scores for general treatment satisfaction. These results suggest that TTR control might influence perceptions of HRQoL and highlight the importance of evaluate anticoagulation status, when assessing HRQoL.An understanding of the factors that influence HRQoL is required in order to adapt economic evaluations to the characteristics of a specific patient
population and assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of different therapeutic alternatives. Our study provided a detailed description of the demographic and clinical profile of uncontrolled NVAF patients on anticoagulants, which should warrant further exploration of the extent to which particular demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients might influence perceptions of their HRQoL.