Study identification

PURI

https://redirect.ema.europa.eu/resource/14166

EU PAS number

EUPAS1821

Study ID

14166

Official title and acronym

Pattern of use of Human Growth Hormone (Somatropin) in the United Kingdom general practice setting: A Drug Utilization Study in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database (Somatropin use in routine clinical practice in UK)

DARWIN EU® study

No

Study countries

United Kingdom

Study description

The study describes the pattern of use of the Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (somatropin) over two decades in patients selected within the UK primary care setting. Namely: • Indications for somatropin • Demographic and clinical characteristics of the treated population • How the clinical profile of somatropin users compare to that of the general population• Pattern of dosage and duration of therapyThe study population includes new users of somatropin between 1 January 1990 and 30 May 2010. Only permanent patients with a minimum of 6 months’ registration with the practice at the time of the first prescription are included.This is a retrospective analysis of somatropin users selected in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. The Network collects pseudo-anonymised electronic medical records of patients managed in the UK primary care setting. Comprehensive patient-level data include diagnostic codes, prescriptions and other health-relevant patient information. Clinical characteristics of treated patients are compared to those of a random sample of untreated patients matched on age and sex to treated patients. Study measures include:• Frequency distribution of study population by sex, age groups and indications, including: GH deficiency, Turner syndrome, chronic renal insufficiency, Prader-Willi syndrome, small at birth for gestational age, other indication • Frequency distribution of dosage at start of therapy and of average length of treatment• Prevalence of major co-morbidities, such as endocrine, cardiovascular, and respiratory diseases, and neoplasmsCategorical data are presented as number and percentage of patients, continuous data are summarized by the number of patients, mean, standard deviation, median, lower and upper quartiles, minimum and maximum values. Where appropriate, two-sided 95% confidence intervals are presented. Statistical testing is reported using a 2-sided significance level of 0.05

Study status

Finalised
Research institutions and networks

Institutions

Contact details

Annalisa Rubino

Primary lead investigator
Study timelines

Date when funding contract was signed

Planned:
Actual:

Study start date

Planned:
Actual:

Date of final study report

Planned:
Actual:
Sources of funding
EMA
Study protocol
Initial protocol
English (188.5 KB - PDF)View document
Regulatory

Was the study required by a regulatory body?

No

Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?

Not applicable