Study identification

PURI

https://redirect.ema.europa.eu/resource/50418

EU PAS number

EUPAS43709

Study ID

50418

Official title and acronym

Single-arm studies with external comparators for cancer drug development: a statistical methodology study to evaluate External Comparator Arm (ECA) study results versus Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) results

DARWIN EU® study

No

Study countries

Netherlands

Study description

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are generally considered by regulators to be the gold standard for establishing a causal relationship between medications and patient outcomes. Several new clinical trial designs have been introduced in oncology drug development based on clinical scientific insights. This is related to the fact that for many cancers, or their (biomarker-selected) subtypes, the target populations are relatively small and/or there is a high unmet medical need. An example of this are trial designs without a parallel randomised control group, such as single-arm trials (SATs), which can be contextualised by providing an external comparator group. The purpose of this statistical methodology study is to advance the knowledge around using SATs with external comparators for cancer drug development, and to develop recommendations on the best practice to incorporate external comparators in the analysis. The results of this study, using data from RCTs and real-world data (RWD), are intended to contribute to the development of recommendations regarding methodologies to be applied and characteristics of situations where evidence generated from a SAT with an external comparator can form a basis for drug approval.

Study status

Finalised
Research institutions and networks

Institutions

IQVIA
United Kingdom
First published:
22/04/2024
InstitutionNon-Pharmaceutical companyENCePP partner

Contact details

Rippin Gerd

Primary lead investigator
Study timelines

Date when funding contract was signed

Planned:
Actual:

Study start date

Planned:
Actual:

Date of final study report

Planned:
Actual:
Sources of funding
EMA
Regulatory

Was the study required by a regulatory body?

No

Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?

Not applicable