Study type

Study topic

Disease /health condition

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Drug utilisation

Data collection methods

Primary data collection
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cross-sectional
Other

Non-interventional study design, other

Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, open, multicenter, stated preferences study
Study drug and medical condition

Medical condition to be studied

Rheumatoid arthritis
Ankylosing spondylitis
Population studied

Short description of the study population

The study sample included 1) patients, 2) rheumatologists, 3) nurses and 4) pharmacists meeting the inclusion criteria and the characteristics necessary according to the objective of the study.

Age groups

  • Adult and elderly population (≥18 years)
    • Adults (18 to < 65 years)
      • Adults (18 to < 46 years)
      • Adults (46 to < 65 years)
    • Elderly (≥ 65 years)
      • Adults (65 to < 75 years)
      • Adults (75 to < 85 years)
      • Adults (85 years and over)

Special population of interest

Immunocompromised

Estimated number of subjects

740
Study design details

Main study objective

The primary objective is to assess the most preferred attributes and the importance of biologics for the management of rheumatic diseases in a real setting according to the different treatment characteristics and points of view and experiences of the different categories of involved subjects (patients, physicians, nurses and pharmacists).

Outcomes

1) To estimate the relative importance according to preferences assigned to the attributes of biological treatments and to explore differences and similarities between the different categories of participants: patients, physicians, nurses and pharmacists. 2) To identify socio-demographic, clinical and other characterisitics that may influence paitient preferences for treatment.

Data analysis plan

The statistical package STATA will be used to conduct the analysis. For all statistical tests, a p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Missing data (e.g. dubious, ambiguous, inconsistent) on socio-demographic and clinical information will be properly identified (e.g. “99”) in the data base and specified in the final report of study results. Unclear data will be traced back, addressed with the participating rheumatologist, and contrasted with the patient’s health record (whenever possible). If data amendment is not possible, data will be regarded as missed.