Study type

Study topic

Disease /health condition
Human medicinal product

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Other

If ‘other’, further details on the scope of the study

Efficacy

Data collection methods

Primary data collection
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cohort
Study drug and medical condition

Medical condition to be studied

HIV infection
Population studied

Short description of the study population

The study will enroll approximately 300 adult (age ≥ 18) treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients initiating treatment with E/C/F/TAF in
accordance with the approved SmPC in routine care.
Participating study sites are specialized on treating HIV patients. All study sites are located in France.

Inclusion Criteria
Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for documentation in this study:
1) HIV-1 infection
2) Initiating treatment with E/C/F/TAF in accordance with the E/C/F/TAF SmPC
3) ≥ 18 years old
4) Signed informed consent

Age groups

  • Adult and elderly population (≥18 years)
    • Adults (18 to < 65 years)
      • Adults (18 to < 46 years)
      • Adults (46 to < 65 years)
    • Elderly (≥ 65 years)
      • Adults (65 to < 75 years)
      • Adults (75 to < 85 years)
      • Adults (85 years and over)

Special population of interest

Immunocompromised

Estimated number of subjects

649
Study design details

Main study objective

To assess effectiveness, safety, adherence, health care resource utilization, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) for quality of life of E/C/F/TAF or R/F/TAF use in routine care.

Outcomes

To evaluate HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell count changes for patients using E/C/F/TAF or R/F/TAF within a time period of 24 months, Rates of ADRs and serious ADRs, motivation for ART initiation in treatment-naïve subjects and factors driving the ART switch to E/C/F/TAF or R/F/TAF in treatment-experienced subjects, adherence and reasons for E/C/F/TAF or R/F/TAF discontinuation during the study, quality of life, health status, treatment satisfaction using standardized questionnaires, health care resource utilization

Data analysis plan

For categorical variables, numbers and percentages of patients were reported. For continuous variables, mean, standard deviation (SD), minimum, first and third quartile (Q1, Q3), median, and maximum were calculated, together with the total number of observations and the number of missing values. Multivariate analyses were conducted to compare treatment naïve and non-naïve treatment groups. Demographics and baseline measures were potential confounders/effect modifiers for multivariate analyses. Confounders/effect modifiers and respective adjustments will be addressed in the Statistical Analysis Plan. AEs/SAEs and comorbidities were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).