Study type

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Assessment of risk minimisation measure implementation or effectiveness
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cohort
Other

Non-interventional study design, other

Non-interventional population based prospective cohort study
Study drug and medical condition

Name of medicine

ZURAMPIC

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code

(M04AB05) lesinurad
lesinurad

Medical condition to be studied

Hyperuricaemia
Gout
Population studied

Age groups

Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Estimated number of subjects

131200
Study design details

Main study objective

To assess the relative incidence of major adverse cardiac events plus hospitalization for unstable angina (MACE+) events in patients with gout after lesinurad is added to their existing XOI therapy regimen and in patients continuing on XOI monotherapy.

Outcomes

Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE+), a composite endpoint comprised of: hospitalisation for non-fatal AMI, stroke, or unstable angina and cardiovascular (CV) death. CV death includes the following causes, occurring in or out of the hospital: AMI, sudden cardiac, heart failure, CV procedures, CV haemorrhage, stroke, underlying cerebrovascular cause, other CV causes. Hospitalisation for AKI including renal failure (with AKI as the primary diagnosis) and each individual component of MACE+.

Data analysis plan

Characteristics for both cohorts will be summarised at the index date. The primary effect estimate is the relative incidence and 95% CI of MACE+ during person-time exposed to lesinurad+XOI compared to that exposed to XOI mono. Time to event for the primary analysis is the day after the start of the index treatment until the first occurrence of a MACE+ or censoring event. Descriptive analyses of MACE+ events and person-time of follow-up will be stratified by patient age group and history of CV disorders. Analysis for secondary endpoints will be conducted analogously.Sensitivity analyses will evaluate the robustness of the estimate for the relative incidence of MACE+ between the two cohorts by differing assumptions for inclusion criteria, exposure definition, outcome definition, and potential unmeasured confounding.If feasible, separate pooled analyses of European data sources and US data sources may be performed.