AN OBSERVATIONAL, PROSPECTIVE, MULTINATIONAL, MULTICENTRE STUDY COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SAFINAMIDE, RASAGILINE AND OTHER “STANDARD OF CARE” AS ADD-ON THERAPY TO LEVODOPA (L-DOPA) IN PARKINSON’S DISEASE (PD) FLUCTUATING PATIENTS (SUCCESS)

25/05/2021
30/10/2023
EU PAS number:
EUPAS41248
Study
Ongoing
Study type

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Effectiveness study (incl. comparative)
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Other

Non-interventional study design, other

This is an observational, prospective, multinational, multicentre study.
Study drug and medical condition

Study drug International non-proprietary name (INN) or common name

SAFINAMIDE METHANESULFONATE

Medical condition to be studied

Parkinson's disease
Population studied

Age groups

  • Adults (18 to < 46 years)
  • Adults (46 to < 65 years)
  • Adults (65 to < 75 years)
  • Adults (75 to < 85 years)
  • Adults (85 years and over)

Estimated number of subjects

1235
Study design details

Main study objective

To evaluate how safinamide, rasagiline and other SoC drugs are associated with the quality of life of PD patients by means of the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)-39 items.

Outcomes

The change from baseline to the end of study (12 months) in the PDQ-39 total score. • The change from baseline to 6 months in the PDQ-39 total score. • The change from baseline to 6 months and to the end of study (12 months) in the PDQ-39 sub-scores (domains and single items). • The change from baseline to 6 months and to the end of study (12 months) in the UPDRS III score. • The change from baseline to 6 months and to the end of study (12 months) in the NRS.

Data analysis plan

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the change from baseline to the end of the study (12 months) in the PDQ-39 total score. Because the treatments will not be randomly assigned to patients, potential confounding and selection biases will be addressed by developing a propensity score for each of the treatment in study (considering other SoC as a single group), using multinomial logistic regression with study treatment as dependent variable and a set of selected covariates (confounders) as independent variables. The propensity score calculated from the logistic analysis for each patient represents the probability that a patient would be treated with safinamide rather than with rasagiline, rather than with other SoC. The calculated propensity scores will be then used to compute weights for a weighted outcome analysis.