Study type

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Disease epidemiology
Drug utilisation
Effectiveness study (incl. comparative)
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cohort
Study drug and medical condition

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code

100000094784
bendroflumethiazide
100000094819
indapamide

Medical condition to be studied

Hypertension
Population studied

Age groups

Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Estimated number of subjects

200000
Study design details

Main study objective

To compare, in an observational study using CPRD data, the effect of bendroflumethiazide versus indapamide on of risk of myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure & death from cardiovascular causes, in patients with hypertension.

Outcomes

The first occurrence of any event within the composite outcome of myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome not resulting in myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, death from cardiovascular causes. The individual components of the primary composite outcome described above, death from any cause, primary outcome or death from any cause.

Data analysis plan

We will analyse time trends in the incidence of hypertension between 1987 and 2015 by sex, age and year of diagnosis. We will describe the antihypertensive therapies prescribed following the diagnosis of hypertension. We will assume that patients were treated with either bendroflumethiazide or indapamide if they received at least two prescriptions for that medication following the diagnosis of hypertension. We will construct two groups by matching patients on a propensity score, namely the probability of exposure to either indapamide or bendroflumethiazide, estimated from a logistic regression model. Time from the Index date to the outcome will be analysed using Cox proportional hazards model. We will conduct two types of analysis: per protocol primary analysis (considering patients only when they were exposed) and intention to treat sensitivity analysis (follow up until outcome or last follow up irrespective whether treatment was discontinued, switched or intensified).