Study type

Study topic

Other

Study topic, other

Disease/Epidemiology study

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Effectiveness study (incl. comparative)

Data collection methods

Secondary use of data
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cohort
Other

Non-interventional study design, other

Non-randomised clinical trial
Population studied

Short description of the study population

Patients with low back pain (LBP) who were previously treated with either nonopioids (group 1), mild (group 2) or strong opioid analgesics (group 3) under conditions of routine clinical practice.

Age groups

Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Special population of interest

Other

Special population of interest, other

Low back pain patients

Estimated number of subjects

756
Study design details

Main study objective

To assess differential treatment effects reported by patients who were switched to the target treatment after failure of a treatment with either a) nonopioids, b) mild opioids, or c) strong opioid analgesics.

Outcomes

Percentage of patients in all 3 treatment groups who fulfilled the criteria of an aggregated5-factor symptom score (ASR-5), defined as a composite of four efficacy parameters (>=50% improvement of pain, pain-related disabilities, clinical phenomenology, and quality-of-life) and one tolerability parameter (>=12mm VAS worsening of the bowel function index). Percentage of patients in all 3 treatment groups who fulfilled at least three out of the fivecriteria of the ASR-5. Further analyses focus on treatment-related changes of pain intensityand associated parameters relevant for daily life functioning, quality-of-life, clinical painphenomenology, concurrent analgesic treatments, bowel function and adverse events.

Data analysis plan

Exploratory analysis of anonymized 12-week routine/open-label data provided by theGerman Pain e-Registry (GPR) on adult LBP patients, in whom a treatment with strong, oral, long-acting WHO-3 opioid has been initiated in compliance with the current German prescribing regulations before December 31, 2018. LBP-patients who were switched to these treatments after failure of nonopioids were defined as group 1, those switches from mild opioids were defined as group 2 and those rotated from other strong opiods were defined as group 3. a propensity score analysis will be performed to select patients in groups 1-3 comparable to those in a previous trial performed with the atypical opioid tapentadol (WHO123TOTAP).No formal sample size analysis will be performed. Data analyses will be performed for allpatients identified through the aforementioned selection proces