Study type

Study topic

Disease /health condition
Human medicinal product

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Assessment of risk minimisation measure implementation or effectiveness

Data collection methods

Combined primary data collection and secondary use of data
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Case-control
Study drug and medical condition

Study drug International non-proprietary name (INN) or common name

HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 16 L1 PROTEIN
HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 18 L1 PROTEIN

Medical condition to be studied

Demyelination
Type 1 diabetes mellitus
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus
Arthritis infective
Immune thrombocytopenia
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Autoimmune thyroiditis
Dermatomyositis
Guillain-Barre syndrome
Myositis
Population studied

Short description of the study population

Study subjects were cases and referents from the PGRx system satisfying with the following criteria:
1. Female gender
2. Age 14 to 26 years old
3. Patient residing in France (continental)
4. Patient accepting to participate in the study

Age groups

Adolescents (12 to < 18 years)
Adults (18 to < 46 years)

Estimated number of subjects

2945
Study design details

Main study objective

This study aims to assess whether the use of Cervarix® is associated with a modified risk of central demyelination, type 1 diabetes (DT1), Cutaneous Lupus, inflammatory arthritis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), systemic lupus erythematosus, myositis and dermatomyositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome and/or Autoimmune thyroiditis and Graves disease by using the PGRx information system.

Outcomes

To assess whether the use of Cervarix® is associated with a modified risk of central demyelination, type 1 diabetes, cutaneous Lupus, inflammatory arthritis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, systemic lupus erythematosus, myositis, dermatomyositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, autoimmune thyroiditis and/or Graves disease at 36 months after the first index case included in the PGRx system.

Data analysis plan

Mainly, two types of analyses are performed with the case-referent design. One without a priori hypothesis the crude analysis (CA) and the other with specific a priori hypotheses the in-depth analysis (IA). The CA is a comparison between cases and referents for their exposure to therapeutic product. The association between an exposure and the occurrence of an adverse event (AE) is quantified through a crude odds ratio (COR) with 90% CI. The COR is not adjusted for the various risk factors (RFs) and not subjected to particular risk curve modelling. In the case of IA, a specific hypothesis is specified and tested regarding an AE and exposure to a specific drug or therapeutic class. This analysis is performed using multivariate techniques with all RFs for a specific pathology as well as co-medications. The association between drug and occurrence of an AE is quantified through adjusted OR with 95% CI. Sensitivity analysis can be performed to assess the robustness of the results.
Documents
Study results
English (1.61 MB - PDF)View document
English (1.74 MB - PDF)View document
Study report
English (4.5 MB - PDF)View document
English (1.37 MB - PDF)View document
Study, other information
English (1.37 MB - PDF)View document