Study type

Study topic

Disease /health condition
Human medicinal product

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Effectiveness study (incl. comparative)
Other

If ‘other’, further details on the scope of the study

Tolerability

Data collection methods

Secondary use of data
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cohort
Other

Non-interventional study design, other

Non-randomised clinical trial
Population studied

Short description of the study population

Patients with low back pain (LBP) who were previously treated with either nonopioids (group 1), mild (group 2) or strong opioid analgesics (group 3) under conditions of routine clinical practice.

Age groups

Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Estimated number of subjects

756
Study design details

Main study objective

To assess differential treatment effects reported by patients who were switched to the target treatment after failure of a treatment with either a) nonopioids, b) mild opioids, or c) strong opioid analgesics

Outcomes

Percentage of patients in all 3 treatment groups who fulfilled the criteria of an aggregated 5-factor symptom score (ASR-5), defined as a composite of four efficacy parameters (≥50% improvement of pain, pain-related disabilities, clinical phenomenology, and quality-of-life) and one tolerability parameter (≤12mm VAS – worsening of the bowel function). Percentage of patients in all 3 treatment groups who fulfilled at least three out of the five criteria of the ASR-5. Further analyses focus on treatment-related changes of pain intensity and associated parameters relevant for daily life functioning, quality-of-life, clinical pain phenomenology, concurrent analgesic treatments, bowel function and adverse events.

Data analysis plan

Exploratory analysis of anonymized 12-week routine/open-label data provided by the German Pain e-Registry (GPR) on adult LBP patients, in whom a treatment with Tapentadol has been initiated in compliance with the current German prescribing regulations before November 30, 2017. LBP-patients who were switched to Tapentadol after failure of nonopioids were defined as group 1 and distinct baseline characteristics of this group (i.e. age, gender, severity of disease and stage of chronification) were taken as matching parameters for a propensity score analysis to find comparable pairs of patients who were switched to Tapentadol either after failure of mild (group 2) or strong opioid analgesics (group 3).No formal sample size analysis will be performed. Data analyses will be performed for all patients identified through the aforementioned selection process.