Study type

Study topic

Disease /health condition
Human medicinal product

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Safety study (incl. comparative)

Data collection methods

Primary data collection
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Other

Non-interventional study design, other

Post-marketing Observational Study
Study drug and medical condition

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code

(L02AE) Gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues
Gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues

Medical condition to be studied

Prostate cancer
Population studied

Short description of the study population

Male adults with prostate cancer diagnosis histologically confirmed who received a Luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue therapy and who had given their written consent to participate in the study or represented by someone who had given said consent in their name in accordance with local recommendations/requirements.

Age groups

Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Special population of interest

Other

Special population of interest, other

Prostate cancer patients

Estimated number of subjects

404
Study design details

Main study objective

The objective of this study was to assess the proportion of patients suffering from prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent cognitive changes before and after a six-month treatment with LHRH analogues.

Outcomes

The cognitive changes were assessed by means of five neuropsychological tests: Digit Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS III), Visual memory test, Line orientation test (Woodward et al.’s abridged version), Matrices (WAIS III) and Mental Rotation of tridimensional objects. Treatment efficacyProstate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and testosterone levels)

Data analysis plan

Scores for each single neuropsychological test were calculated at the baseline and at 6 months, and also their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Additionally the correlations (Pearson Correlation Coefficients) between the baseline period and 6 months were presented for each of the cognitive tests (including the relevant p value). A score above this limit at 6 months was expected to occur less than 5% of the time, and to represent a statistically significant improvement (scores below such limit would mean a significant worsening). The 95% confidence intervals of these proportions were also displayed. In accordance with this, it was also computed the amount of cognitive test having shown significant changes, and so it was calculated the proportion of subjects with at least 1 or 2 or 3 or more cognitive tests (max = 5) with a significant change. Analyses of the subgroups were also carried out to assess whether any different trends had been observed in the subpopulations.
Documents
Study results
English (126.85 KB - PDF)View document