Description of practices regarding supplementation after HYPOvitaminosis-D investigation in middle-age community dwelling general population (HYPO-D Study)

21/12/2012
01/04/2024
EU PAS number:
EUPAS3260
Study
Finalised
Study type

Study topic

Disease /health condition
Human medicinal product

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Drug utilisation

Data collection methods

Secondary use of data
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cohort
Study drug and medical condition

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code

(A11CC) Vitamin D and analogues
Vitamin D and analogues

Medical condition to be studied

Vitamin D deficiency
Population studied

Short description of the study population

Patients aged 13–60 years who had a 25(OH)D assay between 1 December 2008 and 31 January 2009.

Age groups

  • Adolescents (12 to < 18 years)
  • Adults (18 to < 46 years)
  • Adults (46 to < 65 years)

Estimated number of subjects

3000
Study design details

Main study objective

Our purpose was to compare health care use after vitamin D supplementation versus before in patients likely to have 25(OH)D deficiency.

Outcomes

Healthcare use comparison between pre and post-supplementation concerned: the number of physician visits and recorded medical interventions, of different drug prescriptions, of drug classes per distinct dates of prescription -defined by ATC codes, of medical of medical imaging exams, of incident sick leaves and cumulated days of leaves prescribed, and of incident hospitalizations.

Data analysis plan

The study population was described using mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequencies and proportions for discrete variables. The supplemented and the not supplemented groups were compared using t-test when variables were continuous and Chi-square test when variables were discrete. Healthcare use within each group was compared before and after the index date using paired t-tests on the same sample for continuous variables, and Mc Nemar Chi-squared test for discrete variables. A threshold of 0.05 was used for statistical significancy.To adjust the comparison before-after supplementation for potential biases due to different types of healthcare users we used KML clustering. Analyses were performed using SAS Enterprise Guide V 4.3 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA). Longitudinal clustering was performed using R version 2.13.0 with KML package.