Study type

Study topic

Disease /health condition
Human medicinal product

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Disease epidemiology

Data collection methods

Secondary data collection
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cohort
Study drug and medical condition

Medical condition to be studied

Asthma
Population studied

Short description of the study population

Asthma patients with raised blood eosinophil counts at steps 3 and 4 of the GINA guidelines.

Age groups

Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Special population of interest

Other

Special population of interest, other

Asthma patients

Estimated number of subjects

7195
Study design details

Main study objective

To investigate whether poor adherence to ICS therapy explains occurrence of exacerbations or poor asthma control in patients with raised blood eosinophil counts at steps 3 and 4 of the GINA guidelines.

Outcomes

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with raised and normal eosinophil levels at steps 3 or 4 of the GINA guidelines. Patterns of adherence to the ICS treatment in the asthma patients with raised and normal blood eosinophil levels at steps 3 and 4 of the GINA guidelines

Data analysis plan

Descriptive statistics of the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with raised and normal eosinophil levels at steps 3 or 4 of the GINA guidelines will be produced. The number (%) of patients with exacerbations (routine, patient-reported and combined variables) and the proportion of patients with controlled asthma (routine and patient-reported variables) will be calculated. Sensitivity analyses for patients with good treatment adherence (>80%), as well as for lower adherence levels (≤80%) using eosinophils recordings within one year from questionnaire collection and lower cut-off for eosinophil levels (>0.3 x 109/L and ≤0.3 x 109/L) will be performed.Statistically significant results will be defined as p < 0.05 and trends as 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10. Differences between groups will be evaluated through Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate. Intra-group differences will be evaluated through Chi-square test (p<0.05).