Study identification

PURI

https://redirect.ema.europa.eu/resource/26127

EU PAS number

EUPAS26126

Study ID

26127

Official title and acronym

Safety and Tolerability Evaluation Profile in RMS Patients Starting Rebif New Formulation (STEP)

DARWIN EU® study

No

Study countries

Italy

Study description

STEP was an observational, non-interventional, post-authorization safety study (PASS), settled in Italy, to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of HSA-free Rebif formulation (22 and 44 mcg) in treatment naïve patients with RMS. Secondary objectives were to assess the incidence of anti-interferon beta antibody development both of the binding (BAB) and the neutralizing (NAB) type. Tertiary objective was the evaluation of HSA-free Rebif formulation biological activity by monitoring MxA mRNA biomarker, the efficacy by monitoring EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale), FSS (Fatigue Severity Scale) and Multiple Sclerosis Relapse, change in quality of life through the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQol) questionnaire and RebiSmart injection device satisfaction through the RebiSmart questionnaire.The study design planned 200 RMS (Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis) treatment naïve patients recruited from around 29 MS Centers throughout Italy.The study duration included an 18-months recruitment period and a 36-months observation period after the last patient enrolment. Each enrolled patient was observed for a 36-months period starting from the first HSA-free administration, except in case of dropout from the study.

Study status

Finalised
Research institutions and networks

Institutions

Centro Riferimento Regionale Sclerosi Multipla (CreSM)
Multiple centres: 29 centres are involved in the study

Contact details

Antonio Bertolotto

Primary lead investigator
Study timelines

Date when funding contract was signed

Actual:

Study start date

Planned:
Actual:

Date of final study report

Planned:
Actual:
Sources of funding
Pharmaceutical company and other private sector 

More details on funding

Merck Serono S.p.A.
Regulatory

Was the study required by a regulatory body?

No

Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?

Not applicable