Study type

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Effectiveness study (incl. comparative)
Other

If ‘other’, further details on the scope of the study

Safety monitoring
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cohort
Study drug and medical condition

Name of medicine

JARDIANCE

Medical condition to be studied

Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Population studied

Age groups

Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Estimated number of subjects

3000
Study design details

Main study objective

To monitor the safety profile and efficacy of JARDIANCE® (empagliflozin, 10mg, 25mg) in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a routine clinical practice setting

Outcomes

1) PRIMARY OBJECTIVETo monitor the safety profile and effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Korea patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a routine clinical practice setting, 2) SECONDARY OBJECTIVE(1) Change from baseline in HbA1c after 12 weeks and/or 24 weeks of treatment(2)Occurrence of treat to target effectiveness response that is an HbA1c under treatment of < 7% after 12 weeks and/or 24 weeks of treatment(3) Occurrence of relative effectiveness response (HbA1c lowering by at least 0.5% after 12 weeks and/or 24 weeks)

Data analysis plan

1)Analysis of demographic data:Demographic data and the health status of subjects for the safety evaluation will be analysed descriptively.For continuous data, mean, standard deviation, minimum value, and maximum value will be described, while for categorical data, frequency will be shown.2)Safety analysis: In the safety assessment population, the number of subjects to whom AE occurred and the number of AEs will be calculated. Also, the incidence proportion of AEs will be estimated with its 95%confidence interval.3)Efficacy analysis: Mean,standard deviation,minimum value,maximum value,and median of changes in glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose,body weight,and blood pressure, which were measured at the last visit versus baseline, should be presented, and if there is difference before administration versus after administration should be analyzed using paired t-test. The number and percentage of subjects for final efficacy evaluation