Testing new approaches to monitoring benefit/risk with pertussis vaccines as test case: Incidence rates of pertussis and pertussis related outcomes of whole-cell pertussis and acellular pertussis vaccines in pre-school children (benefit study on pertussis vaccination)

10/06/2016
01/07/2024
EU PAS number:
EUPAS13766
Study
Finalised
Study summary
No information provided.
Study identification

EU PAS number

EUPAS13766

Study ID

21757

Official title and acronym

Testing new approaches to monitoring benefit/risk with pertussis vaccines as test case: Incidence rates of pertussis and pertussis related outcomes of whole-cell pertussis and acellular pertussis vaccines in pre-school children (benefit study on pertussis vaccination)

DARWIN EU® study

No

Study countries

Denmark
Italy
Netherlands
Spain
Sweden

Study description

The overall proof-of-concept (POC) question is to test the system for benefit-risk monitoring of vaccines in Europe. This will first be done by using test cases. For this POC, the following research question is used: “Has the initial benefit-risk profile in children prior to school-entry booster been maintained after the switch from whole-cell pertussis vaccines to acellular pertussis vaccines”?There will we 3 different POCs carried out, the one presented here will test the benefits of pertussis vaccines in the population.

Study status

Finalised
Research institutions and networks

Institutions

VACCINE.GRID
Switzerland
First published:
20/08/2024
Institution Not-for-profit
IMS Health
First published:
01/02/2024
Institution

Networks

Contact details

Miriam Sturkenboom

Primary lead investigator

Study timelines

Date when funding contract was signed

Planned:
Actual:

Study start date

Planned:
Actual:

Date of final study report

Planned:
Actual:
Sources of funding
EU institutional research programme
Pharmaceutical company and other private sector 

More details on funding

Sanofi Pasteur, GSK, MSD Sanofi Pasteur, IMI
Regulatory

Was the study required by a regulatory body?

No

Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?

Not applicable