Study type

Study topic

Human medicinal product

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Effectiveness study (incl. comparative)

Data collection methods

Primary data collection
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Cross-sectional
Other

Non-interventional study design, other

Survey of healthcare providers
Study drug and medical condition

Study drug International non-proprietary name (INN) or common name

QUETIAPINE FUMARATE
Population studied

Short description of the study population

Health Care Professionals who were targeted to receive the metabolic educational materials and either currently prescribe or have the potential to prescribe SEROQUEL or SEROQUEL XR.

Age groups

Adults (18 to < 46 years)
Adults (46 to < 65 years)
Adults (65 to < 75 years)
Adults (75 to < 85 years)
Adults (85 years and over)

Estimated number of subjects

800
Study design details

Main study objective

The main objective of this study is evaluation of the effectiveness of the distribution of metabolic educational materials sent to healthcare providers in the EU.

Outcomes

An objective assessment is based upon survey responses related to healthcare provider behavior regarding the monitoring of patients (measures of outcome) and having received and read the educational materials (measures of process).

Data analysis plan

Information obtained from responses to each question of the survey will be reported as descriptive statistics. The survey questionnaire contains questions about the specialty of the physician sample completing the survey, questions specific to whether referrals are made to other healthcare providers for metabolic monitoring, whether the healthcare provider conducts monitoring of patients, general questions regarding receipt of the educational materials, and behavior aboutreading the materials. Each risk minimization behavior included in this study (monitoring of weight, hyperglycaemia, lipids, metabolic risk) will be evaluated individually. The following will be reported, as appropriate, as part of this analysis:- Percent of respondents selecting desired response to each question relating to each risk minimization activity and 95% confidence interval- Percent of respondents demonstrating success of composite risk minimization activities and 95% confidence interval.
Documents
Study results
English (404.57 KB - PDF)View document