Cohort Study of Pioglitazone and Bladder Cancer in Patients with Type II Diabetes

17/08/2012
23/04/2024
EU PAS number:
EUPAS2717
Study
Finalised
Study type

Study topic

Disease /health condition
Human medicinal product

Study type

Non-interventional study

Scope of the study

Disease epidemiology
Other

If ‘other’, further details on the scope of the study

Association between pioglitazone and bladder

Data collection methods

Secondary use of data
Non-interventional study

Non-interventional study design

Case-control
Cohort
Study drug and medical condition

Medical condition to be studied

Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Population studied

Short description of the study population

Patients diagnosed with diabetes, who were age 40 or older and were still members of Kaiser Permanente on January 1, 1997.

Age groups

  • Adults (18 to < 46 years)
  • Adults (46 to < 65 years)
  • Adults (65 to < 75 years)
  • Adults (75 to < 85 years)
  • Adults (85 years and over)

Special population of interest

Other

Special population of interest, other

Diabetes mellitus patients

Estimated number of subjects

193099
Study design details

Main study objective

The main objective of this study was to assess the potential association between pioglitazone and bladder cancer compared with non-pioglitazone users among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Outcomes

The primary outcome for this study was the incident diagnosis of bladder cancer identified from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California cancer registry from 01 January 1997 to 31 December 2012.

Data analysis plan

Continuous and categorical variables were compared with the Wilcoxon rank sum test and chisquare test or Fisher’s exact test, respectively. For the cohort study, Cox proportional hazards models were used for all calculations of the relative hazard (HR) of bladder cancer with pioglitazone, adjusted for the covariates.. Other categories of diabetes medications were included in the baseline model to assess both for confounding and the association of the other medications with bladder cancer. To test for confounding, we separately added the other potential confounding variables to the baseline model to assess for a change in the hazard ratio for pioglitazone or for change in the highest category of pioglitazone exposure in models of dose and duration.