Study identification

PURI

https://redirect.ema.europa.eu/resource/44018

EU PAS number

EUPAS8734

Study ID

44018

Official title and acronym

Alogliptin-5002: Association between therapy with Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and risk of ileus: A cohort study

DARWIN EU® study

No

Study countries

Japan

Study description

Ileus is a form of non-mechanical bowel obstruction. A recent literature report of three cases of ileus in DPP-4 inhibitors treated patients in Japan has triggered this epidemiology study to quantify and assess the risk. To quantify the incidence rate of ileus among T2DM patients new users of alogliptin, other DPP-4 inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Polypeptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and Voglibose. This is a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese Medical Data Vision (MDV) claims database. The study population includes T2DM patients who were new users of alogliptin, other DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, or Voglibose between 04/01/2010-04/30/2014. New users defined as patients without any previous prescriptions for medications of interest before cohort entry. Patients were aged 40+ years at cohort entry and were followed up until the earliest of: incident diagnosis of ileus, or the earliest of the last prescription date of the first therapy episode or day before date of treatment switch/add-on. Incidence rates of ileus were assessed, both overall and by risk time window. Poisson regression models assessed incidence rate ratios (IRR) for ileus with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Study status

Finalised
Research institutions and networks

Institutions

Takeda
First published:
01/02/2024
Institution

Contact details

Dimitri Bennett

Primary lead investigator
Study timelines

Date when funding contract was signed

Planned:
Actual:

Study start date

Planned:
Actual:

Data analysis start date

Planned:
Actual:

Date of final study report

Planned:
Actual:
Sources of funding
Pharmaceutical company and other private sector 

More details on funding

Takeda
Regulatory

Was the study required by a regulatory body?

No

Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?

Not applicable