Study identification

PURI

https://redirect.ema.europa.eu/resource/35405

EU PAS number

EUPAS32386

Study ID

35405

Official title and acronym

Delayed Denosumab Injections and Fractures Risk Among Subjects with Osteoporosis

DARWIN EU® study

No

Study countries

China
United Kingdom
United States

Study description

The overall research question of the proposed study is to examine the fracture risk of delayed denosumab injections among patients who used this medication for long-term osteoporosis management using observational methods in large healthcare databases. The primary exposure delay of subsequent denosumab injections. The primary outcome of interest is composite fracture including all types of fracture. Secondary outcomes include major osteoporotic fracture, vertebral fracture, and hip fracture. The primary analysis strategy is emulating a sequential randomized controlled trials(RCT) comparing the three different strategies (on time, short delay and long delay) using observational data. This study will use an electronic medical record database from general practitioners in the United Kingdom (UK). The analysis will take advantage of naturally occurring variations in the timing of denosumab administration, and examine variation in administration schedule’s impact on fracture risk in routine clinical settings.

Study status

Finalised
Research institution and networks

Institutions

National Clinical Research Center for Musculoskeletal Diseases Beijing, China, Xiangya Hospital Changsha, Hunan, China, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK

Contact details

Daniel Solomon

Primary lead investigator
Study timelines

Date when funding contract was signed

Actual:

Data collection

Planned:
Actual:

Start date of data analysis

Planned:
Actual:

Date of final study report

Planned:
Actual:
Sources of funding
Other

More details on funding

Xiangya Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Musculoskeletal Diseases
Study protocol
Initial protocol
English (187.41 KB - PDF)View document
Updated protocol
English (256.14 KB - PDF)View document
Regulatory

Was the study required by a regulatory body?

No

Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?

Not applicable