Study identification

PURI

https://redirect.ema.europa.eu/resource/11040

EU PAS number

EUPAS11039

Study ID

11040

Official title and acronym

DEVELOPMENT OF OPIOID-INDUCED CONSTIPATION: POST-HOC ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM A 12-WEEK PROSPECTIVE, OPEN-LABEL BLINDED ENDPOINT STREAMLINED STUDY IN LOW-BACK PAIN PATIENTS, TREATED WITH PROLONGED-RELEASE WHO-STEP III OPIOIDS (PROBE-PHA)

DARWIN EU® study

No

Study countries

Germany

Study description

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most prevalent patient complaint associated with longer-term opioid use and interferes with analgesic efficacy, functionality, quality-of-life, and patient compliance.Objectives of this study are to compare effects of prolonged release (PR) oxycodone and PR naloxone (OXN), vs. PR oxycodone (OXY) vs. PR morphine (MOR) on bowel function under real-life conditions in chronic low back pain (LBP) patients refractory to WHO-step I and/or II analgesics.Analyses will base on the complete data set of an already completed prospective (optionally randomized), 12-week open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) streamlined study (German pain study registry: 2012-0012-05, ENCEPP trial registry...), carried out in 88 centres in Germany, where a total of 901 patients, requiring WHO-step III opioids to treat low back pain, were enrolled, and prospectively observed for 3 months. Opioid allocation based on either optional randomization (453) or physician decision (448). In both groups, treatment doses could be adjusted as per the German prescribing information and physicians were free to address all side-effects and tolerability issues as usual.

Study status

Finalised
Research institutions and networks

Institutions

Contact details

Michael Ueberall

Primary lead investigator
Study timelines

Date when funding contract was signed

Planned:
Actual:

Study start date

Planned:
Actual:

Data analysis start date

Planned:
Actual:

Date of final study report

Planned:
Actual:
Sources of funding
Other

More details on funding

Institute for Neurological Sciences
Regulatory

Was the study required by a regulatory body?

No