Study identification

PURI

https://redirect.ema.europa.eu/resource/103552

EU PAS number

EUPAS103551

Study ID

103552

Official title and acronym

Effectiveness, safety and efficiency of the use of vernakalant in the control of the rhythm of atrial fibrillation in the emergency. Cohort study (VERITA)

DARWIN EU® study

No

Study countries

Spain

Study description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice in hospital emergency departments. Complications of AF include thromboembolism and heart failure. In addition, affected patients may be at increased risk of mortality. Within the acute management of AF, two different strategies should be considered: rate control (usually with a beta-blocker or calcium channel inhibitor) and rhythm control (electrical or pharmacological cardioversion). Rhythm and rate control strategies are associated with similar rates of mortality and morbidity, such as embolic risk. The decision to adopt a therapeutic strategy is usually dictated by the presence of symptoms associated with AF and/or the development of left ventricular systolic dysfunction believed to be secondary to the arrhythmia. According to the ESC guidelines, there are different options for pharmacological cardioversion: flecainide and propafenone (class Ic antiarrhythmics), intravenous amiodarone, and vernakalant. Other alternatives, such as dofetilide and ibutilide, are not marketed in Europe. On June 24, 2010, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) adopted a positive opinion, recommending the marketing authorization of vernakalant, indicated for the rapid conversion to sinus rhythm of AF. of recent onset in adults. For its part, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) denied the marketing application for vernakalant due to safety concerns: severe hypotension, ventricular arrhythmias, conduction abnormalities, and death. Currently, the management in terms of AF rhythm control in emergency services varies depending on the idiosyncrasy of each hospital and its own experience of use. In this context, a retrospective observational study is proposed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of vernakalant in clinical practice.

Study status

Finalised
Research institution and networks

Institutions

Contact details

Ruiz-Antorán Belén

Primary lead investigator
Study timelines

Date when funding contract was signed

Planned:
Actual:

Study start date

Planned:
Actual:

Data analysis start date

Planned:
Actual:

Date of interim report, if expected

Planned:
Actual:

Date of final study report

Planned:
Actual:
Sources of funding
Other

More details on funding

The study is not funded
Study protocol
Initial protocol
English (222.45 KB - PDF)View document
Regulatory

Was the study required by a regulatory body?

No

Is the study required by a Risk Management Plan (RMP)?

Not applicable